Sunday, December 26, 2010

When what we say doesn't match up with what we do

I read this excellent article today on :

Walking Santa, Talking Christ

Why do Americans claim to be more religious than they are?

Two in five Americans say they regularly attend religious services. Upward of 90 percent of all Americans believe in God, pollsters report, and more than 70 percent have absolutely no doubt that God exists. The patron saint of Christmas, Americans insist, is the emaciated hero on the Cross, not the obese fellow in the overstuffed costume.

There is only one conclusion to draw from these numbers: Americans are significantly more religious than the citizens of other industrialized nations.

Except they are not.

Beyond the polls, social scientists have conducted more rigorous analyses of religious behavior. Rather than ask people how often they attend church, the better studies measure what people actually do. The results are surprising. Americans are hardly more religious than people living in other industrialized countries. Yet they consistently—and more or less uniquely—want others to believe they are more religious than they really are.

Religion in America seems tied up with questions of identity in ways that are not the case in other industrialized countries. When you ask Americans about their religious beliefs, it's like asking them whether they are good people, or asking whether they are patriots. They'll say yes, even if they cheated on their taxes, bilked Medicare for unnecessary services, and evaded the draft. Asking people how often they attend church elicits answers about their identity—who people think they are or feel they ought to be, rather than what they actually believe and do.

The better studies ascertain whether people attend church, not what they feel in their hearts. It's possible that many Americans are deeply religious but don't attend church (even as they claim they do). But if the data raise serious questions about self-reported church attendance, they ought to raise red flags about all aspects of self-reported religiosity. Besides, self-reported church attendance has been held up as proof that America has somehow resisted the secularizing trends that have swept other industrialized nations. What if those numbers are spectacularly wrong?

To the data: There was an obvious clue (in hindsight) that the survey numbers were hugely inflated. Even as pundits theorized about why Americans were so much more religious than Europeans, quiet voices on the ground asked how, if so many Americans were attending services, the pews of so many churches could be deserted.

"If Americans are going to church at the rate they report, the churches would be full on Sunday mornings and denominations would be growing," wrote C. Kirk Hadaway, now director of research at the Episcopal Church. (Hadaway's research has included evangelical congregations, which reported sharp growth in recent decades.)

Hadaway and his colleagues compared actual attendance counts with church members' reports about their attendance in 18 Catholic dioceses across the country and Protestants in a rural Ohio county.* They found that actual "church attendance rates for Protestants and Catholics are approximately one half" of what people reported.

A few years later, another study estimated how often Americans attended church by asking them to minutely document how they spent their time on Sundays. Without revealing that they

were interested in religious practices, researchers Stanley Presser and Linda Stinson asked questions along these lines: "I would like to ask you about the things you did yesterday from midnight Saturday to midnight last night. Let's start with midnight Saturday. What were you doing? What time did you finish? Where were you? What did you do next?"

This neutral interviewing method produced far fewer professions of church attendance.

Compared to the "time-use" technique, Presser and Stinson found that nearly 50 percent more people claimed they attended services when asked the type of question that pollsters ask: "Did you attend religious services in the last week?"

In a more recent study, Hadaway estimated that if the number of Americans who told Gallup pollsters that they attended church in the last week were accurate, about 118 million Americans would be at houses of worship each week. By calculating the number of congregations (including non-Christian congregations) and their average attendance, Hadaway estimated that in reality about 21 percent of Americans attended religious services weekly—exactly half the number who told pollsters they did.

Finally, in a brand new paper, Philip Brenner at the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research compared self-reported attendance at religious services with "time-use" interviews in the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Norway, Finland, Slovenia, Italy, Spain, Austria, Ireland, and Great Britain. Brenner looked at nearly 500 studies over four decades, involving nearly a million respondents.

Brenner found that the United States and Canada were outliers—not in religious attendance, but in overreporting religious attendance. Americans attended services about as often as Italians and Slovenians and slightly more than Brits and Germans. The significant difference between the two North American countries and other industrialized nations was the enormous gap between poll responses and time-use studies in those two countries.

Why do Americans and Canadians feel the need to overreport their religious attendance? You could say that religiosity for Americans is tied to their identity in a way that it is not for the Germans, the French, and the British. But that only restates the mystery. Why is religiosity tied to American identity?

Historians will point to the European roots of North American colonization. Many European settlers came to the New World in search of religious freedom, presumably because they cared more intensely about religion than did the brethren they left behind.

Perhaps. That answer feels unsatisfactory. I don't think religious intensity necessarily explains how religiosity becomes part of one's identity. Canada and the United States are quite different today in terms of their religious intensity and the importance they attach to the role of religion in public life, yet citizens in both countries greatly exaggerate their church attendance.

Whatever the reason for the disparity, here's the bottom line: For many Americans, church attendance is a central part of their lives. For others, it's a waste of time. If you're in either of these groups, more power to you. But in the spirit of Christmas and the truthteller whose message we celebrate, surely believers and atheists can agree on what to tell folks who talk Jesus but walk Santa: Enough with the two-faced posturing.

I have always said that a researcher could spend his/her entire career investigating the religious and cognitive dissonance:

"According to cognitive dissonance theory, there is a tendency for individuals to seek consistency among their cognitions (i.e., beliefs, opinions). When there is an inconsistency between attitudes or behaviors (dissonance), something must change to eliminate the dissonance. In the case of a discrepancy between attitudes and behavior, it is most likely that the attitude will change to accommodate the behavior."

Atheists will not "win over the hearts and minds" of the religious until theists are willing to really, deeply compare what it is they believe with what IS. I personally like the bus ad campaigns that are of this flavor:

It won't be until theists begin to question this foundational belief...that man is fallen and sinful and cannot choose goodness without god...that they will be able to overcome the cognitive dissonance that they cling to. It won't happen until they can ask themselves a line from "The Work" of Byron Katie: "Is that true? Can you absolutely know that it's true?"

What if we aren't utterly depraved?
What if when non-theists do good things and show love they are doing it without a god?
What if we don't need to be saved?
What if we can be good without god?


Anonymous said...

What difference does it make if a poll says that 99 per cent of the people are atheists?

Christianity could still be true.

And, of course, the reverse.

A poll does not determine the truth.

True Freethinker

Fiery said...

The poll might not "determine" the truth.

It does, however, reveal that a lot of Christians are liars.

Fiery said...

If you're looking for truth, go with science.

evolveintobirds said...

That's correct Anon...a poll does not determine the truth. That was the entire point of the post.

I see you have the ™ on freethought. Bummer.

Snowbrush said...

The problem is that so many of these people still vote in accordance with their beliefs.

-blessed holy socks, the non-perishable-zealot said...

That sign is a great oximoron, brudda, for without our existence, we would have absolutely nuthin.

Fiery said...

don't feed the troll, don't feed the troll don't feed the troll, don't feed the troll.

Anonymous said...

I have a feeling that this blog is a ploy by militant atheists to deceive Christians who are going through spiritual dryness. Very deceptive indeed, especially when the blog won't except any comments that criticise it's motives.

Well, at least I have a worldview, a faith that's objectively true despite people who decided to give in to the ways of the world to delude themselves.

georgi said...

These questions are the reason I love the song by Nicole, 'What If You're Wrong...going to put it on blog again! Christians are saints not yet glorified...we are all sinners to be forgiven (all we have to do is ask ).

-blessed holy socks, the non-perishable-zealot said...

Only telling you da fax, girl, whetha YOU wanna believe'm is up to only one person. YOU ...and one-outta-one bites-the-dust. Hate to break it to ya. Better keep this post, ma'am. Do ya good to learn something about The End. Thus, while you make dandelion’s happy, providing yummy nourishment with your decaying body, your indelible soul rises-up for the General Judgment - whether WE have respected Jesus in this finite existence depends on YOUR free-will. Nuthin’ to do with Him - He’s only the arbitrator. Lookit 'MySoulAccomplishment' first, an effusive, yummy story I wrote yeeers ago about love make’n in Heaven. And, yes, if we have the desire, anything is possible Upstairs. So believe in the Great Beyond, girly, and you SHALL be rewarded in The End --- Won't that be a blastNaHalf?? God blessa youse -Fr. Sarducci, ol SNL